Know exactly what is costing you marks.
Subject scores tell you where you are weak. Concept clusters tell you why. The weak-area report ranks the specific reasoning gaps that repeat across your attempts.
A sample weak-area report
This mock shows the layout learners see in the dashboard. Values are illustrative. Your own report is built only from your attempts.
Calculates expected compensation correctly but stops before checking the delta ratio, missing a concurrent non-gap acidosis.
12 mixed-disorder cases across renal, endocrine and toxicology stems, with the delta step scored separately.
From one wrong step to a ranked cluster
The report is transparent by design. Every cluster can be opened to see the attempts that formed it.
Every divergence is tagged
When your reasoning leaves the reviewed path, the step is tagged with the concept it tested, not just the chapter it came from.
Tags are clustered across subjects
An acid-base error in a renal case and one in a DKA case join the same cluster, because they are the same underlying gap.
Clusters are ranked by breakdown rate
Rate is the share of attempts in that cluster where reasoning broke. Clusters need a minimum number of attempts before they are ranked.
Each cluster links to a drill
Open a cluster to see the typical error pattern, then launch a targeted set built only from that concept.