Module 01

Cases that unfold. Reasoning that gets scored.

Real exam stems reward the ability to update a differential as information arrives. Medutors cases are built in stages so you practise exactly that, one decision at a time.

Stages per case4
Scored dimensions4
FormatVignette + reveal
Case structure

Presentation, data, diagnosis, check.

A sample walkthrough of one cardiology case. Every case in the bank follows this four-stage structure, with the depth scaled to your level.

Why stages matter

Single-shot questions let you pattern-match on the last line. Staged cases force you to reason with incomplete data, which is where most exam errors begin.

Stage 1 - Presentation

Read the case as it arrives

You get what a clinician gets at first contact: age, sex, the complaint in the patient's words and the immediate context. You commit to an initial differential before any tests.

Presentation58-year-old man, two hours of central chest heaviness radiating to the jaw, sweating. Known hypertensive, smoker.
Stage 2 - Data reveal

Request and interpret findings

Vitals, examination and investigations are released in the order you would reasonably ask for them. Each datum is tagged by how much it should shift the differential.

New dataECG: ST elevation in II, III, aVF. BP 96/60. Right-sided leads pending.
Stage 3 - Diagnosis

Commit to a leading diagnosis

You rank your differential and lock in the most likely diagnosis. Confidence is recorded so overconfidence and underconfidence both become visible in your report.

Your callInferior STEMI, suspect right ventricular involvement given hypotension.
Stage 4 - Reasoning check

See the chain, not only the answer

Your path is compared with a reviewed reasoning chain. Correct steps are confirmed, missed clues are highlighted, and the next best step in management is explained.

Reasoning checkAvoid nitrates and diuretics in RV infarct. Give fluids, arrange primary PCI.
What gets scored

Four dimensions on every case

A correct final answer reached by guesswork scores differently from one reached by sound reasoning. Both are tracked, so lucky streaks do not hide real gaps.

Clue recognition

Did you register the finding that should have changed your thinking, such as hypotension in an inferior infarct?

Differential quality

Was the must-not-miss diagnosis on your list, and was it ranked sensibly for the data you had?

Calibration

Did your confidence match your accuracy? Consistent overconfidence is flagged as its own weak area.

Next-step logic

Was the chosen investigation or management step the right one at that stage of the case?

Live demonstration

Watch a differential update in real time

Switch between respiratory, obstetric and endocrine cases. Use Reveal data to step through each stage at your own pace.

CASE RS-0412 · Differential panel
PresentationStage 0/3

A 34-year-old woman presents with sudden dyspnoea and pleuritic chest pain that began this morning. She returned yesterday from a 14-hour flight. She takes a combined oral contraceptive.

Ranked differentialTeaching weights
01Pulmonary embolism36%
02Pneumothorax24%
03Community-acquired pneumonia14%
05Costochondritis12%
04Panic attack14%
Reasoning chain

Recent immobility plus oestrogen exposure, two major VTE risk factors in one history.

Hypoxia and tachycardia, argue against musculoskeletal and anxiety causes.

Equal air entry, unilateral calf swelling, pneumothorax falls, DVT source likely.

High Wells score with raised D-dimer, proceed to CT pulmonary angiography.

Reasoning checkPulmonary embolism prioritised. Next step: CTPA, consider anticoagulation while awaiting imaging.
Illustrative teaching case. Weights show reasoning, not clinical probability.
RxPractice referral · Form MD-01

Stop pattern-matching. Start reasoning.

Presenting concernCorrect answers that feel like guesses
PlanStaged cases scored on clue recognition and calibration
ReviewReasoning profile after your first ten cases
Sign up free Contact supportNo card needed to begin.